Yoga Alliance and the Therapeutic Benefits of Semantics
Or do I need to say “general therapeutic benefits” to be in
compliance? After listening to the Yoga Alliance Q&A for an hour, I’m still
not sure. Yet & still, a few things
were clarified in the call.
It does take some moxie to have a Q&A on the “yoga therapy” controversy. So I do give YA props for opening up the
conversation. Moxie, btw, is the
proprietary name of a soft drink, flavored with gentian root extract, reputed
to have medicinal properties, according to Wikipedia. If I am following the YA
logic correctly – and I am not at all certain that I am – Moxie is an approved
word, but describing it as having medicinal
properties is definitely not.
Likewise, yoga can be described as supporting general wellness. Yoga prescribed by a doctor
canNOT be described as therapeutic or as treatment; only a licensed medical
practitioner can prescribe or perform treatment. Following this logic, if you
go to the doctor for an infection and the doctor prescribes an antibiotic and
the antibiotic gets rid of the infection, you cannot say that it was the
antibiotic that cured you. Antibiotics
do not have a license to treat you. You could, however, say that the
antibiotics provided “therapeutic
benefit.”
So what’s the difference? THIS, I am sure of, as it was
specifically answered in the call. If
you have read the YA web site material, you already know that YA equates “therapy” with diagnosis or treatment
of health conditions. And using the word therapy may mislead the public into
believing that yoga teachers can diagnose or treat health conditions. “Therapeutic benefit” means wellness – sans
diagnosis or treatment. My personal extrapolation is that it’s one thing to say
that as a yoga teacher, I can support you through an illness that leads to
improved wellbeing, but I cannot suggest that yoga will heal you or that yoga is treating your condition.
And if your student writes you a testimonial saying that yoga or you – healed/cured/alleviated
their illness/condition/disease
– you need to reframe it and use approved words because the general public may
be misled into believing that yoga teachers can treat or diagnose health
conditions. Yes, on your private web site, if you use the RYT or RYS
designation, whether you use the logos associated with them or not, you must be
in compliance.
This goes for all advertising
materials in which you refer to the RYT or RYS designations. YA did point
out that being a member of YA is voluntary and that they are available to assist
you with making adjustments to your languaging to be in compliance. I have had several email exchanges with them
to extensively retool the language of my RYS training programs. And they absolutely did help me get this
sorted out.
Thankfully, you can keep the name of your business – and I
am curious to see how many people either add or delete the “therapy” word from
their business name. That’s where
the disclaimer comes in. I feel for the people who have “therapy” in their
program names and now have to change them.
YA is not responsible for the expense, per the answer on the call.
If you do have extensive training as a yoga therapist, get
ready to thank Yoga Alliance…. just as soon as you calm down after reading the
next couple of sentences. Two of the questions that were answered on the call
were from 200-hour yoga teacher training program graduates. One 200-hour program had the words yoga
therapy in it. And the second caller had done a 100-hour program after her
200-hour program that was a yoga therapy program. Yes, you can keep your RYT designation; no,
you can’t call yourself a yoga therapist – based
on those credentials. Or at all on the YA site. On behalf of certified,
extensively trained yoga therapists everywhere, thank you, Yoga Alliance.
I think we can all agree that an ounce of yoga prevention is
worth a pound of yoga therapy. And 100 hours of yoga training does not a yoga
therapist make. I am grateful for the Yoga
Alliance discussion and for the distinction. I am grateful to International Association of Yoga
Therapists for raising the bar and for their upcoming certification process
to officially designate yoga therapists.
I think I understand
that YA is a platform for yoga teachers and not for yoga as treatment of health
conditions.
I am still confused, however, by the yoga research page on the Yoga Alliance web site. If they do not
want to mislead the public into believing that yoga can treat health
conditions, why do they have links to evidence-based research on yoga for
cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, etc? Does this make sense to you?
In compliance,
Leslie Kazadi, *CYT, E-RYT500
Alchemy Yoga Therapy, LLC
Distill your Teaching, RYS 300-hour training program
www.lesliekazadi.com
* The yoga therapy components of my
teaching are based on my certification as a yoga therapist by Loyola Marymount
University, not derived from my status as an E-RYT500, RYS200 or RYS300 with
Yoga Alliance Registry.”
No comments:
Post a Comment